|
The WPA Guides: Mapping America | 
enlarge | Author: Christine Bold Publisher: University Press of Mississippi Category: Book
Buy New: $25.00
New (6) Used (2) from $25.00
Rating: 2 reviews Sales Rank: 368353
Media: Paperback Number Of Items: 1 Pages: 246 Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.9 Dimensions (in): 8.9 x 5.8 x 0.7
ISBN: 1578061954 Dewey Decimal Number: 917.304929 EAN: 9781578061952 ASIN: 1578061954
Publication Date: November 1, 1999 Shipping: Eligible for Super Saver Shipping Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
| |
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
In 1935 the FDR administration put 40,000 unemployed artists to work in four federal arts projects. The main contribution of one unit, the Federal Writers Project, was the American Guide Series, a collectively composed set of guidebooks to every state, most regions, and many cities, towns, and villages across the United States. The WPA arts projects were poised on the cusp of the modern bureaucratization of culture. They occurred at a moment when the federal government was extending its reach into citizens' daily lives. The 400 guidebooks the teams produced have been widely celebrated as icons of American democracy and diversity. Clumped together, they manifest a lofty role for the project and a heavy responsibility for its teams of writers. The guides assumed the authority of conceptualizing the national identity. In The WPA Guides: Mapping America Christine Bold closely examines this publicized view of the guides and reveals its flaws. Her research in archival materials reveals the negotiations and conflicts between the central editors in Washington and the local people in the states. Race, region, and gender are taken as important categories within which difference and conflict appear. She looks at the guidebook for each of five distinctively different locations -- Idaho, New York City, North Carolina, Missouri, and U.S. One and the Oregon Trail--to assess the editorial plotting of such issues as gender, race, ethnicity, and class. As regionalists jostled with federal officialdom, the faultlines of the project gaped open. Spotlighting the controversies between federal and state bureaucracies, Bold concludes that the image of America that the WPA fostered is closer to fabrication than to actuality. Christine Bold is director of the Centre for Cultural Studies and an associate professor of English at the University of Guelph in Guelph, Ontario.
|
| Customer Reviews:
So-so look at a great American enterprise September 9, 2005 13 out of 14 found this review helpful
The American Guides to the 48 states, select cities, and other geographical/historical places published by the government in the late 1930s-early 1940s were many things to many people: New Deal Progressive ideology, state boosterism, national unity, etc. Bold looks at five guidebooks and finds the following in four of them:
Idaho: the first book, edited and totally controlled by Vardis Fisher, offering a "frontier man's" view of the state and among the best of the guidebooks published;
New York City: an ideological battleground between left and right that came to celebrate economic and cultural diversity;
North Carolina: filled with local color and racial prejudice, the "haves vs. the have-nots";
Missouri: where local color was bleached out by the heads in Washington when the book was taken out of the hands of local writers; result: a bland, flavorless guide.
Many of Bold's points are based solely on the illustrations in the guides. She also says nothing about the other guides, so the title of the book is somewhat misleading: there is a lot more about the guides left out than discussed. She writes in a pedestrian, academic style, too, which is not appealing. I expected more from this book and was generally disappointed.
Academic beyond the call of duty April 10, 2001 22 out of 24 found this review helpful
I bought this hoping that it would be a good, general assessment of the WPA Series, their accuracy, and their lasting impact. Alas, it turned out to be an almost ureadable piece of academese, interested only in how the governmental structure of the Guides' authorship muted the voices of protest and dissention -- as though any government, anywhere, has ever done otherwise, and without regard to how strikingly honest some of the guides (such as the first editions of the Washington DC and New Jersey Guides) were about issues such as racism and labor unrest. The study is weakened imeasurably by a narrow focus on only a few of the Guides; most US research libraries have most or all of them available. Ms. Bold's is also wanting; no focus on the writers (such as Cheever, Wright, and Algren) who participated in the project, no catalogue of the guides (which extended to regions, cities, and even small towns, and included local ephemera), and no mention of the best-known citation of the Guides in her consideration of their reputation: Steinbeck's pean to them in Travels with Charley. This could have been a good and useful study of the Guides; instead, it is worse than useless. Rather than a discussion of the facts paired with an analysis, Ms. Bold chose to publish a sterling example of why it is that historical writing is usually equated with tedium and polemics.
|
|
|
| Other schools are available at CollegeFans.com | |